Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23-02-2005, 10:36 PM   #1
rob_o
Regular Member
 
rob_o's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 383
Default New Magna

Taken from GoAuto E-News


Mitsubishi releases fi rst details of its make-or-break Magna replacement
By BYRON MATHIOUDAKIS
FIRST-RATE quality, an advanced V6 engine, improved
transmissions, sophisticated suspension and a stiff
body will help defi ne Mitsubishi’s crucial new Magna
replacement as a dedicated driver’s car.
This was the message Mitsubishi Motors Australia
Limited (MMAL) delivered this week in the fi rst of a series
of briefi ngs to be held in the run up to the sedan’s launch at
the Australian International Motor Show in October.
While the new nameplate and a moniker for higherseries
models (replacing Verada) are still to be confi rmed,
MMAL management stressed the $600 million it has
invested in the car, codenamed PS41, would ensure it
was far removed from its left-hand drive North American
donor car, the Galant.
Indeed, 70 per cent of PS41 will be new and more than
2000 components unique to the Australian-made vehicle.
This week’s briefi ng was held in conjunction with the
opening of a new $40 million ‘AA Class Tandem Press Line’
which, as part of a wider $250m upgrade to Mitsubishi’s
Tonsley Park assembly plant, is said to “guarantee”
unprecedented levels of quality in an Australian vehicle.
According to Mitsubishi, the ability to stamp one-piece
body side mouldings, and increased accuracy stemming
from new manufacturing processes like Mitsubishi’s ‘Toy-
Tab’ panel-fi t system, will contribute to a signifi cantly
stronger, smoother, quieter and more refi ned car, and one
which is also easier to enter and egress.
“Our mandate is to have our new car be the best-quality
car ever built in Australia,” said MMAL President and
CEO, Tom Phillips.
The new processes will make for a stiffer body – thought
to be almost double that of the current Magna – which in
turn will aid handling, ride and refi nement qualities to the
point where MMAL insists the PS41 will lead all locally
produced vehicles in these areas. And most imports, too.
This, in turn, fi ts neatly with fi ndings from the largest
market research campaign Mitsubishi has ever undertaken
in Australia, which indicates that Australian family car
buyers now consider sportiness and power to be prime
purchase considerations.
To that end, the PS41 will use a variation of Mitsubishi’s venerable 3.8-
litre 24-valve V6 engine that – backed by the company’s MIVEC variable
valve technology and a new-generation Bosch engine management system
– should boost power and torque to around 192kW and 335Nm respectively,
as well as improve emissions and driveability.
MMAL’s General Manager for Research and Development, Lee Kernich,
said the company took the opportunity to improve the V6 – to be built in
Japan – as it had to be re-engineered to meet the relevant Australian Design
Rules.
It has been calibrated “to suit Australian drivers”, and is part of what Mr
Kernich referred to as “control tuning” and “optimising” of the entire PS41
drivetrain, including the drive-by-wire accelerator pedal and wheel/tyre
combinations.
A smoother, less-intrusive traction control system will also form part of
the package, while Mr Kernich added further that the engine management
system would be compatible with a turbocharger.
He stopped short of saying there were plans for such a model, but take it
as read that one is at least on the drawing board.
Harnessing all this is an upgraded fi ve-speed automatic transmission
with a Tiptronic-style shift and a new control unit featuring driver-adaptive
hardware for increased response and greater effi ciency.
A manual gearbox, believed to be a six-speed unit, will further enhance
the PS41’s driver-orientated credentials.
Questioned on possible enthusiast driver resistance to
the car’s continuing front-wheel drive set-up, Mr Kernich
pointed to research indicating 70 per cent of large-car
buyers did not consider front-drive a disadvantage. Toyota
could also attest to this with the success of its Camry
Sportivo.
All-wheel drive variants have been ruled out for now.
A strut-based front suspension design with a fl at
fabricated cross-member and low-mounted steering rack,
and a similarly placed multi-link arrangement in the rear,
are expected to reduce road noise as well as boot-space
intrusion.
Ultimately, “excellent roll control, fl at cornering feel and
European handling characteristics” are all promised for the PS41.
Body rigidity, already stiffened by the single-piece stamping system, will
be bolstered by extra body bracing between the front suspension strut towers
and rear-seat bracing – meaning the new car, like the current Magna, will
eschew a split-fold rear seat.
According to Mr Kernich, incorporating a split-fold mechanism
compromises body strength and rigidity. However, he did indicate that a
larger aperture than the Magna’s ski-port opening should be available.
Braking will be by 16-inch ventilated discs up-front and 16-inch gridventilated
discs at the rear, the latter a preferred option over the 14-inch
solids used on the US Galant.
It seems Mitsubishi has run out of time and resources to
develop 17-inch wheels for the PS41, which must comply
with the company’s extensive year-long wheel-testing regime
before being signed off for production.
Far from being a hindrance to the Australian team, the US
Galant platform has provided substantial economies of scale
in various development and engineering areas.
“If we had to start with a clean sheet of paper we’d still
pretty much end up with the vehicle we have now,” Mr
Kernich said.
The fi rst Australian prototype PS41 in right-hand drive
form was developed in September 2003 and was tested
extensively here, in Europe (mostly Germany) and Japan.
Around August last year, the fi rst off-tool-parts prototype
arrived.
The car is now in the trial production phase, and will again repeat the
vigorous testing leading up to Job Number One (to borrow a Ford phrase)
in September.
Confi rmation of the car’s name is expected next month, ahead of the
unveiling of the PS41’s locally adapted exterior styling which should carry
greater differentiation than ever between the main car and higher-series
model.
rob_o is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 23-02-2005, 11:19 PM   #2
Hawk
I am The Brain!
 
Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 648
Default

A little bit hard to read....but the information is there. Hopefully for Mitsu's sake it doesn't look as horrendous as it has been.
__________________
Long Live Cricket - Australia's favourite sport


Woohoo 1.6L 1999 Toyota Corolla....feel the power!

I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I am not sure you realise that what you heard is not what I meant.
Hawk is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 12:04 AM   #3
RSgerry
Well hello Mr Fancypants
 
RSgerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,066
Default

all they really need to do is change that front end and sales will double. are they really that out of touch?
RSgerry is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 12:14 AM   #4
Cobra
Bear with a sore head
 
Cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 3,699
Default

All the really need is RWD and a 6.1L hemi V8.
Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 12:17 AM   #5
InitialD
Low and Loud
 
InitialD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,273
Default

I think the latest Magna is great, Id rather it anyday over a crappy commo
__________________
1993 Ford Fairlane NC3 Silver - LTD mockup, Worked V8 & Auto, Fully Optioned, Half of my Audio department at work installed in the car

1993 Ford Falcon XR6 Poly Green Stationwagon - 4.0 I6, Auto, 3:45LSD, All the usual XR6 Stuff but in a wagon :
InitialD is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 12:22 AM   #6
Aussie Falcon
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Aussie Falcon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NSW
Posts: 546
Default

There are Magna sketches in John Mellor's GoAuto e-news, the rear angle especially looks rather sporty.

http://mellor.carsales.com.au/mellor/enews.nsf/edition/$first
Aussie Falcon is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 12:29 AM   #7
lv619
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
lv619's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,521
Default

man that was hard to read...


Lets just hope (for mitsubishi's sake) that they dont end up with another abortion of a car like their last one (style wise). Would be interesting to see how they fair with a turbo though (that is if they actually end up going down that path).
__________________
Me fail English? That's unpossible.
lv619 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 12:37 AM   #8
XP6
Formerly ST170ish
 
XP6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Down south
Posts: 1,670
Default

Whats so hard about reading that?
XP6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 12:42 AM   #9
lv619
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
lv619's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,521
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ST170ish
Whats so hard about reading that?
Maybe if they were aligned formally and not all clustered together (i.e. in seperate paragraphs) it would help... :tosser1: sleep:
__________________
Me fail English? That's unpossible.
lv619 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 12:51 AM   #10
4.0i_SiX
SiX_iN_a_RoW
 
4.0i_SiX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Capalaba Brisbane
Posts: 770
Default

Change the magna to a RWD format ( too large to be a FWD imo ) or just go AWD on all models, completely revamp the front end styling and they might have a car worth buying
__________________
Oh yeah, my G6ET eats diff bushes for breakfast!
4.0i_SiX is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 10:49 AM   #11
Bearman
Moderator Ford Coupe Club
 
Bearman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vic
Posts: 3,905
Default

Sounds great from Mitsubishi but they have overlooked one vital detail. This car needs to be RWD!!!

Fafuxsakes, when are these clowns going to learn?? Instead they continue to push onto the Aussie motorist a configuration that has been overwhelmingly rejected. "FWD not a hinderance to enthusiasts" they say? "Attest to the success of the Toyota Camry Sportivo" Success?? At what?? I see two-thirds of f*ck all of them on the road. Huge success.........

With Mitsubishi persisting with the large car FWD configuration it is ensuring it will only ever be a bit player in this market and will never be competitive with Ford or Holden
__________________
Mitsubishi ASX Auto, White - Daily Commuter
XC Fairmont Coupe, 351 4spd, Graphite Grey - The Antidote

http://www.fordcoupeclub.org

"If you don't know where you're going, any road will take you there" George Harrison 2001.
Bearman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 03:19 PM   #12
loxxr6
XB in parts...
 
loxxr6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,890
Default

RWD or 4WD would be good.

The series prior to the current one looked sweet.

The US one I've seen pics of looks fugly.
__________________


Has Fez and XB.


loxxr6 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 05:00 PM   #13
turboute
turboute
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 502
Default

So who would consider the Magna a worthy rival to either the Falcon or Commodore if it was RWD? (compared to stock 6 cyl variants of each)
turboute is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 05:09 PM   #14
RED_EL_XR8
Banned
 
RED_EL_XR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Not suffering Fools Gladly!!
Posts: 2,864
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by turboute
So who would consider the Magna a worthy rival to either the Falcon or Commodore if it was RWD? (compared to stock 6 cyl variants of each)
Thats Mitsubishisi problem they allways tried to flog cars off as something they weren't. Our market wasn't big enough to support another player is the same very competitive segments. Magna is not in the Falcon class and no amount of deceptive advertising will get it there. It would need lots more than just RWD.

Mitsubishi should take a look at Subaru, they build great cars that never pretend to be anything other than Subarus. And that is why they are successful.

If Magna had concentrated on being a better medium class car it may have stood a chance. :gren:
RED_EL_XR8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 05:10 PM   #15
Polyal
Virtuous Bogan (TM)
Donating Member2
 
Polyal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TAS
Posts: 27,446
Default

I think the magna would sell alot better if it was RWD, but exports are high on their list aswell remember and teh US and where ever else it goes want FWD for safety reasons. In other words they cant drive for Sh!t, but to be fair they drive in ice/snow alot more than we do.
__________________
  • 2023 Mitsubishi Triton
  • 2017 Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
  • 2003 CL7 Honda Accord Euro R (JDM) - K20A 6MT
  • 1999 Lexus IS200 - 1G-FE Turbo 6MT
  • 1973 ZF Ford Fairlane
Polyal is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 07:06 PM   #16
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Its weird that the biggest wheel size they have is 16 inch. Are these guys stupid or what. Who will buy the sports version when the biggest wheels available are the same size fitted to a BA XT. The BA upgrade will be launched around the same time and will crap on it from great heights although the new V6 seems like it will go pretty well.
How are they going to recoup the 600 million dollars they spent when they will probably sell less than 2000 a month. Will it be like the current model Magna and still be on sale in mildly updated form 10 years from now? I think its the only way they can.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 07:32 PM   #17
b2tf
not here much anymore
 
b2tf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sthn NSW
Posts: 22,918
Default

In regards to the wheels - not everybody wants to have 17 or 18" wheels, and pay for them as well as the tyres. Fleet cars etc, cars with older owners, are usually the ones who will stick with the basic options of a 15 or 16" wheel.
__________________
RAM 1500
b2tf is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 07:47 PM   #18
DanXR6T
Eat more peanuts....
 
DanXR6T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kingaroy, Qld
Posts: 502
Default

umm if i read it correctly it says 16" BRAKE DISCS not rims.. The rims would have to be bigger..
__________________
'04 Falcon XR6T Ute, Envi, K&N filter, F6 Intake, Twin 2.5" exhaust...

Formerly owned:
'99 AU Falcon Ute
'88 EA Falcon GL
DanXR6T is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 07:48 PM   #19
Lukeyson
Right out sideways
 
Lukeyson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Coffs Harbour NSW
Posts: 5,303
Default

crap torque for a 3.8litre
__________________
2010 FG XR50 Turbo | 2007 FPV BFII GT, BOSS 302
Lukeyson is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 08:39 PM   #20
buickman
buickman
 
buickman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: eastern suburbs Melb Vic
Posts: 1,462
Default

I think it might look a bit like the one's for sale in the US.
Here is a site that the car might look like.

www.mitsucars.com/galant/index.html

buickman
buickman is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-02-2005, 09:12 PM   #21
8pAc
RDP #181
 
8pAc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 438
Default

Galants are much nicer than magnas IMO, and come in awd turbo format, it is slightly smaller than the magna and it probably would have landed them more sales.
8pAc is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-02-2005, 01:38 AM   #22
Dave_au
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northern Sydney
Posts: 1,908
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RED_EL_XR8
Mitsubishi should take a look at Subaru, they build great cars that never pretend to be anything other than Subarus. And that is why they are successful.
Wheels actually found the AWD Magna to be a better car than the Liberty in a road test a while back (and also better than the Maxima), not that anyone cares to remember.

Quote:
Originally Posted by XR8fella
crap torque for a 3.8litre
Holdens old ecotec 3.8L provided 305NM, the high performance version of the new alloytec puts down 340NM, the standard Alloytec puts down 320NM.

I don't think its as crap as your suggesting.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bearman
Fafuxsakes, when are these clowns going to learn?? Instead they continue to push onto the Aussie motorist a configuration that has been overwhelmingly rejected.
Well with the exclusions of the prestige euro cars, the far majority of "family owned" cars are fwd. Toyota is number one by selling them. Most people put perceived safety, quality and looks above performance when choosing a car. We need to remember that the car enthuisast is in the minority these days. Most people couldn't give a stuff about the actual driving dynamics between fwd and rwd.

Mitsubishi is basically in the same position that Ford would be in right now had they not spent the money on the BA or if the BA failed. Who cares whether its FWD, RWD, AWD 6WD - so long as it works. Realistically how many people on the roads seriously drive their cars to such a limit that a distinction between RWD and FWD is needed? Maybe towing, thats about it. You can only drive up to 110km/h anyway, and you can't say any engine over 2.2L these days wouldnt have highway overtaking performance.

What matters is that competition is always good and its important that Mitsubishi have some success with this model otherwise quite a few aussies will be on the dole que and South Australia will lose a major industry. Its bad enough the engine plant has closed.
Dave_au is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-02-2005, 01:38 AM   #23
RATT
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think it has nothing to do with RWD for the market Mitsu is in. Lets wait and see what the car will be like before we pass judgement.
  Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2005, 08:15 PM   #24
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Axeman82
umm if i read it correctly it says 16" BRAKE DISCS not rims.. The rims would have to be bigger..
If you read down a little bit further it says that Mitsubishi didn't have the funds to develop 17 inch or bigger wheels. So 16's are the biggest.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 26-02-2005, 08:18 PM   #25
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by back2thefutura
In regards to the wheels - not everybody wants to have 17 or 18" wheels, and pay for them as well as the tyres. Fleet cars etc, cars with older owners, are usually the ones who will stick with the basic options of a 15 or 16" wheel.
Not everyone does but people who purchase the sports models would prefer big wheels, and tyres for 17's these days are reasonably priced. 16's as the biggest size on a car as big as this is pathedic, especially considering that 16 inch is the smallest you can get on a Falcon.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2005, 01:30 AM   #26
Dave_au
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Northern Sydney
Posts: 1,908
Default

The TJ VRX did sit on 17s.
Dave_au is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2005, 11:06 AM   #27
FNQracing
RAGE Engineering
 
FNQracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 651
Default

I could be way off the mark here, but I beleive this spy shot that appears to have been taken in outback Oz to be the next Magna.



Seems very close to the "official sketch" from GoAuto

__________________
If it doesn't fit, use a BIGGER hammer

Last edited by FFOracing; 27-02-2005 at 11:08 AM.
FNQracing is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2005, 11:32 AM   #28
The Stylist
Automotive Designer
 
The Stylist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 751
Default

[QUOTE=FFOracing]I could be way off the mark here, but I beleive this spy shot that appears to have been taken in outback Oz to be the next Magna.

I don't think it is the next Magna. The new Magna will share the same basic hard-points as the U.S. market Galant, such as the roof line/glass area and the doors - which look very different compared to that spy shot.

Brave money would label the spy pic as the VE Commodore or the next Falcon or even the next Camry. But is likely a U.S. market car.
The Stylist is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2005, 11:42 AM   #29
8pAc
RDP #181
 
8pAc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 438
Default

That looks much nicer side on at the back but ffs make it RWD
8pAc is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-02-2005, 11:49 AM   #30
Olympus
Rocket Fuel Anyone?
 
Olympus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, S.A.
Posts: 1,099
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Polyal
I think the magna would sell alot better if it was RWD, but exports are high on their list aswell remember and teh US and where ever else it goes want FWD for safety reasons. In other words they cant drive for Sh!t, but to be fair they drive in ice/snow alot more than we do.
We haven't been exporting to the US for over a year now.
Export is only GCC, as in countries like Iraq, Iran, Kuweit etc..
We have send a tiny amount to Canada, but.
Olympus is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 09:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL