Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24-06-2012, 09:24 AM   #1
FrogInASock
Getahaircutandgetarealjob
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Newcastle area, NSW
Posts: 123
Default "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

Following on from this thread on the death of the GTHO Phase IV:

http://www.fordforums.com.au/showthread.php?t=11369265

... just something for discussion.

The XR GT had a 289 V8 with disc brakes. The XT had the 302, XW had the 351, and the XY had the 351 heavily warmed over. But still with pretty basic discs, drums and suspension.

My question to the learned masses is: What 1972 capable things should Ford have put into the Phase IV? Your answer should note that whatever you decide to include in your 1972 bullet on wheels should be available in that year (no computers, ABS, stability control, or the like).

Please write legibly in blue or black pen and pass your papers forward at the end of the exam.

__________________
Te pilos recidene volo et opus solidus capere :
FrogInASock is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 09:47 AM   #2
Bushbasher
When in doubt, GAS IT!!
 
Bushbasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Lower Eyre Peninsula, SA
Posts: 3,018
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

Not so much should have but maybe that should be could have. I'll start and say rear disc brakes.
__________________
.





HERS- BFIII Wagon Gold, alloys, dual fuel, bullbar, big tow pack, trans cooler, fully rebuilt HD suspension, Clarion, alarmed, full 2 1/2" sports system, mint body

MINE- AUII Forte
Meteorite, dual fuel but otherwise bog stock.

MINE- AUII Fairlane Sportsman Liquid Silver over meteorite,HIDs', Airhog, Eagle Leads, dual fuel, custom rear springs, BA slotted discs + a second one for spares

.
Bushbasher is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 03:48 PM   #3
pottery beige
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 18,982
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

alloy heads, rock n rolls, decent manifold







and better brakes..
pottery beige is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 04:01 PM   #4
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

-Magnesium door hinges
-Fiberglass boot, bonnet and doors
-Alloy bumpers
-hemi heads
-Twin 4 barrels
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 04:53 PM   #5
Gavin Thomas
* 1962 XK Deluxe Sedan *
 
Gavin Thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northern Territory
Posts: 901
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

"Shut the gate".....Last of the V8's.

Run all the items as per the famous lines in Mad Max when the Mechanic dude, aka Barry, is giving the run down to Max on the engine spec's as per the Black interceptor Coupe.....Phase 4 heads, twin overhead cam's...."600HP thru the wheels",

Also note = To correct some of the GT statement in the opening post =
The first XW's had the Windsor 351, but the Clevo's fitted to the later P2 XW's actually had a much "warmer" camshaft grind than the refined & more "user friendly" camshaft as fitted to the 351C in the P3 XY GT.

Cheers.

Last edited by Gavin Thomas; 24-06-2012 at 05:14 PM.
Gavin Thomas is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 05:01 PM   #6
burnz
VFII SS UTE
 
burnz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Central Coast
Posts: 6,341
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

well 4 wheel ventilate disk brakes, bucket seats with harness seatbelts,
hidden roll cage.

these were all available at the time, maybe help with the saftey aspect of govco.
__________________
I don't often hear the sound of a screaming LSX.
But when I do, So do the neighbours..
GO SOUTHS
burnz is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 05:25 PM   #7
castellan
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,215
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

The main thing was to use the better brake pads.
Better shocks.
Get rid of your tyres when they were 1/2 worn as they got hard and were even more useless even tho they were rubbish new
castellan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 06:04 PM   #8
Cabbage
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Cabbage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,264
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

an insurance discount!
Cabbage is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 06:17 PM   #9
Linkachu
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Benalla vic
Posts: 628
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

One of them polarizer things, i heard they did things only in dreams.
Linkachu is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 06:23 PM   #10
gtxb67
moderator ford coupe club
 
gtxb67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,640
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikked
-Magnesium door hinges
-Fiberglass boot, bonnet and doors
-Alloy bumpers
-hemi heads
-Twin 4 barrels
and maybe a parachute that deployed at all braking efforts over 60kph and have a little guy in there pack it all back in before the next stop



there was nothing wrong with the car as such. it was a much more refined car than the phase 3. the rules for racing and what was suitable for the road were always going to cross paths at some stage. if it wasn't the phase 4 that was canned, then it would have been the phase 5 or 6 or whatever the doomed racing/production car was called
gtxb67 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 07:25 PM   #11
max_torq
From the Futura
 
max_torq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 569
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

4 link rear with coil springs and verticle shocks
__________________
1979 Ford Thunderbird Heritage Edition (See Here!)
max_torq is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 07:35 PM   #12
Gavin Thomas
* 1962 XK Deluxe Sedan *
 
Gavin Thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Northern Territory
Posts: 901
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Linkachu
One of them polarizer things, i heard they did things only in dreams.
************************************************** ***************

You should wash your mouth out mate - as they were just a "gimick" thing fitted to cheap opel based commodores. ( Also late 80's - so your a generation & 1/2 past the mighty XA P4 GT anyway ).

The only real achievement it caused was to create the divide that saw GMH & Brocky, rest his soul, part ways.
Gavin Thomas is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 07:51 PM   #13
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gavin Thomas
************************************************** ***************

You should wash your mouth out mate - as they were just a "gimick" thing fitted to cheap opel based commodores. ( Also late 80's - so your a generation & 1/2 past the mighty XA P4 GT anyway ).

The only real achievement it caused was to create the divide that saw GMH & Brocky, rest his soul, part ways.


http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sarcasm
__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 08:22 PM   #14
Road_Warrior
Pity the fool
 
Road_Warrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wait Awhile
Posts: 8,997
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

Definitely 4 wheel disc brakes. Perhaps with the use of the 15 inch Bathurst Globes, could they have used a slightly larger disc on the front?

and +2 to the comment about coil sprung rear suspension. This was tech and design easily within Ford's reach at the time.
__________________
Fords I own or have owned:

1970 XW Falcon GT replica | 1970 XW Falcon | 1971 XY Fairmont | 1973 ZG Fairlane | 1986 XF Falcon panel van | 1987 XFII Falcon S-Pack | 1988 XF Falcon GLS ute | 1993 EBII Fairmont V8 | 1996 XG Falcon ute | 2000 AU Falcon wagon | 2004 BA Falcon XT | 2012 SZ Territory Titanium AWD

Proud to buy Australian and support Ford Australia through thick and thin
Road_Warrior is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 08:57 PM   #15
Mickxr8
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Mickxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: republic of wa
Posts: 869
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

Rear discs would of helped , A bullet in evan green would`ve helped so much more
__________________
"You can't fight stupid people - there's just too many of them.The internet: Access to all the world's idiots
Mickxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 09:13 PM   #16
Franco Cozzo
Thailand Specials
 
Franco Cozzo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Centrefold Lounge
Posts: 48,382
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

Since there was no computer modules back in the 1970s, I'll throw mechanical fuel injection into the mix
Franco Cozzo is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 09:20 PM   #17
Nikked
Oo\===/oO
 
Nikked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tamworth
Posts: 11,348
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Long time member, loves Fords, sensible contributor and does some good and interesting posts. 
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Damo
Since there was no computer modules back in the 1970s, I'll throw mechanical fuel injection into the mix
Like these beasts!

__________________





Check out my Photo-chop page

T...I...C...K...F...O...R...D
\≡≡T≡≡/
Nikked is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 24-06-2012, 09:31 PM   #18
Bossxr8
Peter Car
 
Bossxr8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: geelong
Posts: 23,145
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

Mostly the things Ford already had in the pipeline, like the rear discs.

Roller rockers would have been one of the best things they could have done, considering how many engines they lost over the next few years due to rocker failures in Group C.

Makes me wonder why they never fitted roller rockers for durability, yet they went to the effort to hand machine the combustion chambers of the Ph 4 heads, which would have been very time consuming and expensive.
Bossxr8 is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-06-2012, 03:14 AM   #19
Moby Vic
Cynical Idealist
 
Moby Vic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 1,512
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

427 SOHC engine!
__________________
Your plastic pal who's fun to be with!
Moby Vic is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-06-2012, 08:53 AM   #20
OzJavelin
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
OzJavelin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,633
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrogInASock
My question to the learned masses is: What 1972 capable things should Ford have put into the Phase IV? Your answer should note that whatever you decide to include in your 1972 bullet on wheels should be available in that year (no computers, ABS, stability control, or the like).
Don't see why not .. the technology for stuff like this had been around, just not as cheap-and-cheerful as the mass-produced, computerised stuff we use today. Looking at is a more of a GT (Grand Tourer) than the track-only Phase4 there is a lot of driving/safety technology which could have been installed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-lock_braking_system
Quote:
Chrysler, together with the Bendix Corporation, introduced a computerized, three-channel, four-sensor all-wheel[4] ABS called "Sure Brake" for its 1971 Imperial.[5] It was available for several years thereafter, functioned as intended, and proved reliable.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_injection
Quote:
The first commercial electronic fuel injection (EFI) system was Electrojector, developed by the Bendix Corporation and was offered by American Motors Corporation (AMC) in 1957.[8][9] The Rambler Rebel, showcased AMC's new 327 cu in (5.4 L) engine. The Electrojector was an option and rated at 288 bhp (214.8 kW).[10]
.. although the Bendix system, along with the mechnical Rochester system were quite unreliable (especially in cold weather), the capability had been there from approx 15years before the XA ..

In a real flight-of-fantasy a "no dollars spared" Phase4 could have had the lot .. as in 1972 a lot what is standard equipment in cars now (aside from the junk we don't need for driving like iPods, etc) was already in-progress .. like airbags:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbag
Quote:
Airbags for passenger cars were introduced in the United States in the mid-1970s, when seat belt usage rates in the country were quite low. Ford built an experimental fleet of cars with airbags in 1971
I think the engine has already been covered? 427 SOHC .. probably reconfigured as a DOHC (i.e. DOHC has apparently been around since 1919?)

OzJavelin is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 25-06-2012, 12:02 PM   #21
Moby Vic
Cynical Idealist
 
Moby Vic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Orlando, FL, USA
Posts: 1,512
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

The 427 SOHC existed in 1972 (actually, it was a few years out of "production" by then).

Actually, I suppose a Coyote DOHC Indy engine could have been converted to a front engine configuration. That would make an interesting addition.
__________________
Your plastic pal who's fun to be with!
Moby Vic is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-06-2012, 02:31 PM   #22
castellan
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,215
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Road_Warrior
Definitely 4 wheel disc brakes. Perhaps with the use of the 15 inch Bathurst Globes, could they have used a slightly larger disc on the front?

and +2 to the comment about coil sprung rear suspension. This was tech and design easily within Ford's reach at the time.
The 1967 to 1972 LTD Galaxie had coil sprung rear with a pan-hard rod, like the HZ holdens.
But ford loved the leaf rear, the FG ute rear leaf setup is not all that bad now.
castellan is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-06-2012, 08:27 PM   #23
Landau Stable
Landau Tragic
 
Landau Stable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,094
Technical Contributor: For members who share their technical expertise. - Issue reason: For his many posts on welding and fabricating for coupes 
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

Had the supercar scare not happened, i think by the time the phase 5 was rolled out we would have already seen rear disc brakes, perhaps larger front brakes from a galaxie adapted, as well as engine improvements like roller rockers, better intake and exhaust/headers. No doubt there would have also been earlier installments of electronic ignition, and probably better hugging seats for race duties. Perhaps also some of the stiffer bracing as fitted to later P5's and Landaus at the A pillars. Potentially a larger winged sump as well. I don't think Ford would have gone to the extent of coiul rears. It was costly enough as it was, without such a major change to the car. The rest is more bolt on mods.
__________________
STOLEN Cosmic blue Landau. Engine and Vin no: JG70PU12931K. Please pm me if you have any info
Landau Stable is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-06-2012, 08:31 PM   #24
pottery beige
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 18,982
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

dry sump..
pottery beige is online now   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Old 27-06-2012, 09:30 PM   #25
max_torq
From the Futura
 
max_torq's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 569
Default Re: "Better Technology" on the Phase IV? Discuss...

when they built the coupe body they could have put the shock set up already used in the capri, and adapt the coil spring hardware from the 1972 torino.

... and zinc plate the things.
__________________
1979 Ford Thunderbird Heritage Edition (See Here!)
max_torq is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL