|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
OzECruisers General Discussions E/N/D vehicles General Discussion ONLY. NO TECH THREADS |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-05-2006, 01:43 PM | #31 | |||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wheelers Hill
Posts: 365
|
Quote:
__________________
ED XR8
|
|||
09-05-2006, 04:39 PM | #32 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wheelers Hill
Posts: 365
|
i should add that its not impossible to use straight O2. the reaction is just extremely hard to control and i exagerated a bit when i said pistons flying throught the boned
__________________
ED XR8
|
||
09-05-2006, 07:19 PM | #33 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
|
On the contraryl, it's not actually "unstable". You've just described what I posted, but in a different way. Basically the air/fuel ratio becomes uber lean.
14 parts air --> 1 part fuel is the optimum ratio. But around 13ish parts to 1 is on the safe side. Now, air contains roughly 21% O2. So if you had 14 parts O2 to 1 part fuel, this would be the equivalent of roughly 75(!!!) parts AIR to 1 part fuel. Of course, too much air (beyond say 20 parts) will actually snuff out the combustion, as the air "drowns" the fuel. But with pure oxygen, I'm not sure what would happen. I say the excess air would snuff out the combustion because of all the intert compounds, namely N2. I'm not a chemist though so I may be wrong here. |
||
09-05-2006, 07:33 PM | #34 | ||
Tha Stah
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Werribee
Posts: 414
|
Either way, thats some good gargan ur spitt'n out there
__________________
1998 EL XR6: |Custom POD Filter Intake, Pacemaker 4499's, Redback 2.5" Catback - straight through tail pipe.|. 113,000kms. Best E/T: |15.080 @ 91.03mph | R/T: 0.848 | 60': 2.175 | 660': 9.674 | Colour: |Regency Red.|. Soon To Come: |Largish Cam + Chip| ETA: *When the bank account is ready * |
||
10-05-2006, 12:11 AM | #35 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Smoking the bags in a Turbo 6-speed ED!
Posts: 1,208
|
I think he meant 'volatile' rather than 'unstable' guys...
Oxygen by itself is extremely volatile...it tends to explode violently, rather than 'burn', and it is very easy to make it go bang. So when you put it in an engine, once it sparks the cylinder pressures go through the roof in a very very small space of time, which I believe results in damage to the engine because the piston/rod/crank recieves a 'shock' rather than being pressed down quickly like in a normal combustion event. I think they mix it in a 33% oxygen 67% Nitrogen ratio to slow the combustion process down a little, and make it slightly safer to work with. I think... |
||
10-05-2006, 12:20 AM | #36 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
|
Ahh ok, "volatile" puts it in a different light ;)
And yes, the N2O is literally a 2:1 ratio of N vs O The nitrogen also kind of acts as a quencher for the heat output of the oxygen combusting, if I'm not mistaken. Turbo + Intercooler in one, so to speak, lol |
||
10-05-2006, 12:44 AM | #37 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Smoking the bags in a Turbo 6-speed ED!
Posts: 1,208
|
I thought nitrogen cooled the intake charge because it is stored as a room temperature liquid, and when it escapes through the nozzle in a nitrous system it expands rapidly into a gas, therefore its temperature goes down, bringing intake temps with it.
(same principle as how an air con system works - compressed gas is squirted through a small orfice and as it expands its tempetature drops significantly, therefore cooling the air flowing past the evaporator...) |
||
10-05-2006, 01:35 PM | #38 | ||
Girrrrr!!!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 580
|
double post
__________________
Falcon EF XR6 in Heritage Green Heritage green, isn't that a fence paint? Last edited by AshMan; 10-05-2006 at 01:51 PM. Reason: double post |
||
10-05-2006, 01:35 PM | #39 | |||
Girrrrr!!!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 580
|
Quote:
__________________
Falcon EF XR6 in Heritage Green Heritage green, isn't that a fence paint? |
|||
10-05-2006, 02:17 PM | #40 | |||
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,303
|
Quote:
Like when I tell someone to turn "left", when in reality I mean "the other left" (right). |
|||
10-05-2006, 03:42 PM | #41 | ||
Regular Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Wheelers Hill
Posts: 365
|
back to the point does anybody think this would actually work.. i believe that it would cause way too much damage to be practical and i dont think it would work.
also does anyone else find it funny that we have gone into a full on chemistry conversation about all this
__________________
ED XR8
|
||
11-05-2006, 10:04 AM | #42 | ||
Girrrrr!!!
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 580
|
someone give me $8 for a can of freeze spray and I'll try it on the missus' car
__________________
Falcon EF XR6 in Heritage Green Heritage green, isn't that a fence paint? |
||