Quote:
Originally Posted by DJR-351
Well forgive me if i dispute you and your 'acquaintance' because no information to its lack of provenance has yet come to light, there has been no dispute put forward to support you/your 'acquaintances' claim as yet which an up front an honest individual would do if that individual had said information available......is your 'acquaintance' going to present his/her findings to the proper authorities to prevent this supposed illegal fraud taking place?
You/Your 'acquaintance' would be doing everyone involved a service to bring to light these claims and getting the issue clarified, and prevent the below from recurring, after all they are very serious claims with very serious consequences involved.....if found to be valid.....
https://www.drive.com.au/motor-news/...0161102-gsgh3x
https://www.hemmings.com/blog/2012/0...-falcon-xw-gt/
https://www.examiner.com.au/story/18...falcon-seller/ |
Seriously can't we discuss like regular people instead of resorting to childish barbs and repetitious use of "acquaintance" in an attempt to try to make a point.
I was simply restating what the mate told me in a text when I sent him details of the car.
Sales like this are 'buyer beware', he has obviously come across some question marks regarding the car and isn't happy to bid. That doesn't mean 'fraud' or any bs simply that he isn't happy and won't bid despite having the means to.
It's always up to each and every potential purchaser to ensure that they are satisfied enough to actually bid.
I've been and viewed classic cars at auction before that had unsupported claims made about them and simply walked away. I'm sure many of us have similar experiences.