View Single Post
Old 09-11-2019, 07:29 AM   #89
jpd80
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
 
jpd80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,169
Valued Contributor: For members whose non technical contributions are worthy of recognition. - Issue reason: Thoughtful contributions to our community 
Default Re: vFacts October 2019

Quote:
Originally Posted by BENT_8 View Post
No, I mean there have been discussions in regards to the Raptor and the choice to use a little 2.0l in a FP product, but im more aiming at the towing comparison threads where anyone who questions the 2.0l's durability to perform in the same way the 3.2l did is met with comments about being old school and outdated in thinking because Ford want people to transition to the smaller capacity engine.
And again, its probably a good bit of kit and adequate for most applications, the problem is in the message that you must conform to it being the new norm because that's what they want you to believe.
Ford have a habit of telling people what to buy rather than asking them, a wise man once said to me, smart businessmen have bigger ears than mouths..
Bent, there was only one chart that had to be shown to people



^^^^That is why most Ranger buyers have now switched,
the 2.0l is an effective replacement for the 3.2l and alllowed
Ford to charge more for increased efficiency but, what about
the buyer who wants even more power.....that's the key here,
Ford is preparing people for another power lift and yes, cost more.
jpd80 is offline   Reply With Quote