First experience .. Vic law regarding passing emergency vehicle

[Franco Cozzo]

Originally Posted by Beastie

Turns out that the "Porsche Driver" is a free man out on bail this afternoon.

Yeah but you look at the ridiculous conditions he has to abide by, might as well as stay in then try sue for compensation when he finally has his trial and gets a slap on the wrist for being a knob.

He just upgraded his prison cell and has more choice of cuisine that's about it because all the conditions are ridiculous and then having all these trumped up BS charges slapped on, the fact they tried to prosecute him on BS charges should mean IBAC investigation, scratch the surface, I'm interested to see whats beneath.

How many times have the BS charges been slapped on and someone was prosecuted for them because they don't have the financial resources 'Porsche Driver' has to fund a decent legal team?

[MITCHAY]

I know I said I wasn't going to comment again but **** me dead.

Yes I know we can argue the toss about the charges as I have done and not going to again but a bloke on bail for offences commits more and then is given bail again

[JasonACT]

But that's not what happened, he wasn't simply given bail again... Time has passed... Quite a lot, actually.

[hayseed]

He's just spent (almost) six Months in the Big house on remand, I'm Tipping When He does get to Court the Sentence will be "Time served"..

Undoubtedly, he'll get off a heap Better than the Truck Driver & His Boss Will..

[b0son]

Originally Posted by JasonACT

Quite a lot, actually.

being offensive is worse than being violent these days.... i was astounded he's been in custody this long.

[MITCHAY]

If you commit offences while on bail you should be held on remand. Isn't that one of the conditions of bail

[b0son]

Originally Posted by MITCHAY

If you commit offences while on bail you should be held on remand. Isn't that one of the conditions of bail

Sure, but was there any reason the case relating to his prior offences couldnt have been heard already? Will the time already served count towards these other charges? I'm betting no.

[Franco Cozzo]

https://www.news.com.au/national/vic...a7f000f6a23120

Mohinder to plead guilty, but dropping 27 charges?

How the hell does that work, did they just lay on BS charges.

[FoxtrotGolfXray 5.0]

Originally Posted by Franco Cozzo

https://www.news.com.au/national/vic...a7f000f6a23120

Mohinder to plead guilty, but dropping 27 charges?

How the hell does that work, did they just lay on BS charges.

I'd imagine it would have been negotiated as part of the plea bargain.

[Tassie f100]

Maybe someone here could explain to me,how being a bit of a drug dealer, and being in possession of ammunition, would have been a factor in the truckies driving abilities that afternoon

[hayseed]

Originally Posted by Franco Cozzo

https://www.news.com.au/national/vic...a7f000f6a23120

Mohinder to plead guilty, but dropping 27 charges?

How the hell does that work, did they just lay on BS charges.

given the C.O.R. legislation, His Employer will be in for a World of pain Too..

[Tassie f100]

Originally Posted by hayseed

given the C.O.R. legislation, His Employer will be in for a World of pain Too..

Pretty sure the truck company manager copped charges of manslaughter or similiar

[hayseed]

It would appear that; Mr. Pusey is not he Sharpest knife in the drawer..

https://www.theage.com.au/national/v...28-p56qdl.html

[M&Ms]

Originally Posted by hayseed

It would appear that; Mr. Pusey is not he Sharpest knife in the drawer..

https://www.theage.com.au/national/v...28-p56qdl.html

Either he's one step ahead trying to be declared mentally unhealthy, or, the media in his face, hearing his name on the news constantly, being targeted as "The Porsche Driver," and basically being made out to be a murderer of four, has finally gotten to him. Probably better off for his mental state to be in a cell until January. Meanwhile, it's very quiet about Mohinder....

[Full Noise]

Originally Posted by hayseed

It would appear that; Mr. Pusey is not he Sharpest knife in the drawer..

https://www.theage.com.au/national/v...28-p56qdl.html

Without defending his actions, I wouldn’t read too much into it. At the end of the day, he has a target on his back and the cops will want to charge him for dropping his guts in the wrong direction.

My take on it…
Possibly an argument that has escalated. Broken glass, that could have been something as simple as dropping a glass or accidental breakage of a table, who knows? The vision of him on the roof doesn’t really show someone highly agitated and considering what the media are like, if this is the only vision they have, it’s as bad as it is.

With my utter contempt for the mainstream media, I’ll decode some of the BS in their “news” story. So the charges are…

1. Making threats to kill. Yeah, I’ll believe it when I hear the audio.
2. False imprisonment. So he told his missus not to open the door to the cops?
3. Common law assault. Really? Such a broad term here. Keep in mind that spitting falls under Common Law Assault, so he could have been yelling without a face mask on and the “brave” officer could have reported that he felt saliva on his skin as a result.
4. Committing an indictable offence whilst on bail. Yeah, pretty standard that one.

Here’s common law assault.

https://www.judicialcollege.vic.edu....s/CCB/4957.htm

So concerned neighbours called 000 after hearing screams and the sound of smashing glass, yeah right. I wouldn’t be surprised if the “concerned neighbours” have been in discussions with police command and have been told to keep an “extremely accurate” account of “anything” that happens at Pusey’s house. Not surprising really and this is common for police to instruct “good Samaritans’ in their civic duty, you know, we‘ll scratch your back, etc.

So Pusey refused to let the police in. Well, do you blame him? If the nosey neighbours next to me called the cops and they turned up, I’d tell them to f@#* %$f as well. Just for the record, I have told the police to F@#$ %#f from my doorstep in the past.

So instead of opening the door, he ran to the rooftop and “spat” abuse to a woman inside the home as well as dozens of “brave” police at the bottom of his property, blah blah blah.

Then a “tense” stand off that lasted for about three hours before the CIRT smashed his door in. Do they really think that anyone out there believes this BS?

Knowing what he’s built like, and the fact that there would be…
1. No immediate danger to the female inside.
2. Knowing that there is an “extremely remote” possibility of weapons inside, apart from the obvious ones, it must have been extremely tense, oh, these police are so brave.

Anyhow, thank you Vicpol for keeping us all so safe. Tonight I will put a blue Harpic Flushmatic in my cistern so whenever I look down, I will think of the brave members of Vicpol. #respectblue

[Itsme]

Originally Posted by Full Noise

Without defending his actions, I wouldn’t read too much into it. At the end of the day, he has a target on his back and the cops will want to charge him for dropping his guts in the wrong direction.

My take on it…
Possibly an argument that has escalated. Broken glass, that could have been something as simple as dropping a glass or accidental breakage of a table, who knows? The vision of him on the roof doesn’t really show someone highly agitated and considering what the media are like, if this is the only vision they have, it’s as bad as it is.

With my utter contempt for the mainstream media, I’ll decode some of the BS in their “news” story. So the charges are…

1. Making threats to kill. Yeah, I’ll believe it when I hear the audio.
2. False imprisonment. So he told his missus not to open the door to the cops?
3. Common law assault. Really? Such a broad term here. Keep in mind that spitting falls under Common Law Assault, so he could have been yelling without a face mask on and the “brave” officer could have reported that he felt saliva on his skin as a result.
4. Committing an indictable offence whilst on bail. Yeah, pretty standard that one.

Here’s common law assault.

https://www.judicialcollege.vic.edu....s/CCB/4957.htm

So concerned neighbours called 000 after hearing screams and the sound of smashing glass, yeah right. I wouldn’t be surprised if the “concerned neighbours” have been in discussions with police command and have been told to keep an “extremely accurate” account of “anything” that happens at Pusey’s house. Not surprising really and this is common for police to instruct “good Samaritans’ in their civic duty, you know, we‘ll scratch your back, etc.

So Pusey refused to let the police in. Well, do you blame him? If the nosey neighbours next to me called the cops and they turned up, I’d tell them to f@#* %$f as well. Just for the record, I have told the police to F@#$ %#f from my doorstep in the past.

So instead of opening the door, he ran to the rooftop and “spat” abuse to a woman inside the home as well as dozens of “brave” police at the bottom of his property, blah blah blah.

Then a “tense” stand off that lasted for about three hours before the CIRT smashed his door in. Do they really think that anyone out there believes this BS?

Knowing what he’s built like, and the fact that there would be…
1. No immediate danger to the female inside.
2. Knowing that there is an “extremely remote” possibility of weapons inside, apart from the obvious ones, it must have been extremely tense, oh, these police are so brave.

Anyhow, thank you Vicpol for keeping us all so safe. Tonight I will put a blue Harpic Flushmatic in my cistern so whenever I look down, I will think of the brave members of Vicpol. #respectblue

Your point of view is invalid since you were not present at time of incident and have no knowledge of it other than media reports, I'm sure the legal process will sort this matter out in due course.

[jaydee]

This is what has been alleged in Court,
Not as trivial as some others have interpreted.

Mr Pusey is accused of unlawfully imprisoning a woman and holding her against her will.

Police allege he threatened to kill the woman.

He placed a noose around her neck, “placing her in danger of serious injury”, police allege.

The man has also been charged with assault.

Police allege he sent “abusive and derogatory text messages and made phone calls” that were “menacing” over the three-day period leading up to his arrest.

[burnz]

Originally Posted by MITCHAY

If you commit offences while on bail you should be held on remand. Isn't that one of the conditions of bail

that's like being under arrest for resisting arrest.

[burnz]

Originally Posted by jaydee

This is what has been alleged in Court,
Not as trivial as some others have interpreted.

Mr Pusey is accused of unlawfully imprisoning a woman and holding her against her will.

Police allege he threatened to kill the woman.

He placed a noose around her neck, “placing her in danger of serious injury”, police allege.

The man has also been charged with assault.

Police allege he sent “abusive and derogatory text messages and made phone calls” that were “menacing” over the three-day period leading up to his arrest.

and i'm sure the police allegations have actual evidence and not hearsay.. sarc

[jaydee]

Originally Posted by burnz

and i'm sure the police allegations have actual evidence and not hearsay.. sarc

Yeah I guess so, like body cams, the noose, the terrified victim, the boarded up door that had to be smashed in and the long suffering neighbors.
A police officers direct evidence of what they saw and heard is not hearsay.
Hearsay is what someone else said happened and you repeat it without evidence, unless that person comes to Court and testifies.
Part of his bail conditions was to open the door to Police, which apparently he didn't do.
That's hearsay on my behalf, just going by what has been reported.

[hayseed]

https://www.theguardian.com/australi...nd-womans-neck

[burnz]

Originally Posted by jaydee

Yeah I guess so, like body cams, the noose, the terrified victim, the boarded up door that had to be smashed in and the long suffering neighbors.
A police officers direct evidence of what they saw and heard is not hearsay.
Hearsay is what someone else said happened and you repeat it without evidence, unless that person comes to Court and testifies.
Part of his bail conditions was to open the door to Police, which apparently he didn't do.
That's hearsay on my behalf, just going by what has been reported.

if they had body cams he would have gotten gaol.

[Franco Cozzo]

I vote he goes back into jail for his crimes against fashion for that ridiculous 1970s hairstyle he is rocking at the moment

[FoxtrotGolfXray 5.0]

Eastern Freeway Porsche driver Richard Pusey pleads guilty to three charges

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-...uilty/13232032

[ford71V8]

So of all the charges thrown at him he is guilty of only 3, 1 being the dubious charge that the lawyer claimed didn't exist.....odd.

[Bossxr8]

Originally Posted by ford71V8

So of all the charges thrown at him he is guilty of only 3, 1 being the dubious charge that the lawyer claimed didn't exist.....odd.

They really wanted to pin the indecency charge on him.

[hayseed]

Originally Posted by ford71V8

So of all the charges thrown at him he is guilty of only 3, 1 being the dubious charge that the lawyer claimed didn't exist.....odd.

No, he's only pleaded Guilty to 3 of Them...

They're not finished with Him Yet........


https://www.theage.com.au/national/v...15-p56ueo.html

[M&Ms]

https://www.9news.com.au/national/ea...8-8796ff8b6b8d

Mohinder Singh, who was driving the truck that ploughed into the four officers near Kew on April 22 last year, has pleaded guilty to four counts of culpable driving causing death and six other charges in relation to the crash.
Today, the 48-year-old could not even raise his head to look at family members as they learned he was involved in a drug deal just minutes before the fatal crash.


Mohinder is starting to make Richard look like a saint.

[Ben73]

Hear a lot about Pusey, what about the guy who actually killed them, what did he plead and to what?

[Romulus]

Originally Posted by FoxtrotGolfXray 5.0

Eastern Freeway Porsche driver Richard Pusey pleads guilty to three charges

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-03-...uilty/13232032

If only for that silly video being taken and uploaded to social media Mr Pusey would have likely walked months ago. At best the Police have a speeding charge and failing to render assistance (possibly) to level against him.

Guess he's learnt a valuable lesson about posting content on social media.