Quote:
Originally Posted by cheap
Books/writings/drawings from the dawn of time telling of things unexplained, prophets/preachers being able to predict the future, visions and ghosts. Literally every culture has these concepts.
But then along came "modern" science, and these phenomena are debunked, ridiculed and ignored.
IMO using science to debunk the unexplained is somewhat counterproductive, someone mentioned they struggle with concepts that aren't provable. I struggle with the cult of quantum mechanics and its reliance upon virtual particles?
Is a virtual particle any different to a ghost?
|
I'd opine that science debunked flat earth (for most people) and debunked that heaven is "up there" - I can't see what is counterproductive about that - unless I miss your meaning?
I'm not up to speed with virtual particles but in any event I don't have the qualifications to make a judgement.
I can guess but that's as good as it gets.
I guess that they are different
