Quote:
Originally Posted by FPV8U
Sadly at some point this will be the case, if for example a successful vaccine or an approved treatment cannot cannot be developed within a certain timeframe the risk v reward marker will slide, not everyone can work from home, economically the third and first world are both taking a hammering and that cannot be maintained for an indefinite amount of time whilst expecting a government to maintain a level of serviceability to its people.
We all have our different views on this topic that have cyclically been discussed in here since the beginning of all of this some months ago.
We are now seeing the compulsory mask debate come into Australia, in time it will be a compulsory vaccine debate.
These debates will rage on as will the push for us to return to a less restrictive environment at risk of infection and possible fatal infection for those who are less capable of naturally fighting off the disease.
|
All of these things will challenge our civil liberties and the lifestyles we have all become accustomed to. The real debate will be why we are doing what we’re doing. Is it to preserve our way of life or to preserve our economy which many will state is how we secure our way of life ....
Time to re assess what matters most and how we preserve that. In 2-3 years time we’ll have global vaccination security for CVD-19. The issue will be how we manage the next unknown zoonotic viral outbreak again and what will our priorities be.